My friend Walter hates when people, as he puts it, try to “put words on things” – things like movies or music. A jazz musician and a fan of shoot ‘em up action movies, he likes to let himself be carried away by the experience without any need for analysis. His wife Gayle, an editor who is embroiled in the world of words and a fan of as she describes them, dreary angst-ridden foreign films, can’t understand Walter’s view. After an evening of watching a movie that they can actually agree on, Gayle the wordsmith needs to talk about it, while Walter, the artist, refuses.
Being both an artist and a writer, I can understand both sides. Sometimes too much analysis or too many big words get in my way. Walter defies anyone to aptly define precisely what it is about a movie that can take us into a preposterous world and make us buy into it, to feel it in our hearts, or in the same vein to explain why particular musical passages resonate with us. I agree that it’s impossible to describe these things in a way that does justice to how we actually feel when we experience them.
But I do understand the need for words as well when describing something that’s experiential, like Reiki. I need the words to help me understand it better so that I can be better prepared to explain things clearly to others. For instance, non-duality is a big concept in Reiki. My first Reiki class didn’t really touch on non-duality, but as my studies deepened and I heard the term being used often, I needed to find out more about it.
Non-duality is oneness, or to be at one with the universe. (Don’t worry if you don’t know what non-duality is, or even if you don’t want to know what it is, I’m not going to get into details. If you just go with the flow you’ll make it through this wordy post just fine.)
In my pursuit of finding out more about just what the heck non-duality was, I learned that it’s a common concept in eastern philosophies – a given that’s completely alien to the culture I grew up in. I read that masters don’t have a need to “put words on it” – to talk about it would be to view it as something separate, therefore creating duality. By the time I had gotten about this far in my studies, my head was spinning. I got the concept, and yet I didn’t. That’s the difference between reading about something and experiencing it.
I’ve been thinking a lot about words lately, in specific, the word ‘energy’ after reading Nancy’s comment to a post about Reiki in which she said she thought of Reiki as energy work. I’ve heard the word ‘energy’ used several times in the past few weeks by a lot of people who were referring to a lot of different things. I have heard of Reiki described as an energetic practice, and in fact, I described it that way when explaining why Reiki can’t be learned from a book. Reiki is also described as vibrational.
I came across this September 13, 2007 interview on the Phyllis Lei Furumoto’s radio program, Reiki – Balancing Essence and Form, with Pamela Miles who spoke about use of the word ‘energy’ and the vibrational nature of Reiki, relating it to what physicists call the unified field, and who also described it as primordial consciousness, the “non-dual ground of being – touching that part of us that doesn’t die”, and “the part that’s balanced.”
The interview is chock full of complicated words and phrases, but together, Phyllis and Pamela managed to pull them apart and put them into simpler terms that were more easily understandable.
Interestingly enough, many of the words used, like “vibration” “consciousness” and “balance” got me thinking more deeply – not only about Reiki, to which they are indeed important, but also about flower essences and homeopathy. As Pamela described Reiki and primordial consciousness, I remembered how flower essences are described – as non-aromatic liquids that capture the vibrational pattern of the flowers used in their creation, and which are also called ‘liquid consciousness’. And as my mind wandered farther down its path of thought, I remembered that homeopathic remedies, that when used in their highest capacity, are chosen to match the spirit of the recipient, and are created by diluting a substance to the point where only the vibration, or memory of it remains.
The concept of memory, or ‘remembering’ came up later in the interview when Pamela described how healing takes place during a Reiki treatment. Reiki practitioners often talk about trusting that Reiki will go where it’s needed. I was struck by Pamela’s comment that Reiki doesn’t really “go” anywhere, but likened what happens during a Reiki treatment as the resonation that happens between tuning forks. The practitioner’s hands spontaneously tune to the vibration of recipient’s wellness – both are reminded of the “pulsation of wellness”. The tuning fork is the example that Sharon Callahan also uses to describes how flower essences work by giving off a harmonious frequency and drawing that which is out of harmony to it until both vibrate in harmony.
Reiki, flower essences and homeopathy are three distinctly different things, but they share a lot of the same qualities. Although their creators were a diverse group from different places and times in history – a Buddhist of Samurai descent from Japan, a surgeon turned immunologist from Great Britain, and a physician from Germany – all incorporated both spirituality and intention into their healing methods, using a radically different mindset than the one from which western medicine springs. One could say that each truly embodies the essence of compassion.
Words sometimes become white noise when they are bandied about too freely. Everyone’s heard the phrase: body, mind and spirit that has become just so much just blah blah blah by now. The precision and care taken in choosing the words used to describe Reiki in the interview, however, underscored for me the importance of them, not only for Reiki but also for other truly holistic modalities who share a similar perspective.
So. …words. We hear them all the time in different contexts. Listen to them closely and choose them wisely. Sometimes they will be most effective in ways we never intend or imagine.
Recent Comments